Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > Thanks, this is obviously the right thing to do, and the mistake is mine > from ea97002fc (t/perf: time rev-list with UNINTERESTING commits, > 2014-01-20). This is not the first time I've been confused by missing > variables in t/perf scripts, since it behaves differently than the > normal test suite. I wonder if we should turn on "set -a" during t/perf > setup snippets. That's a bit of a blunt tool, but I suspect it would > just be easier to work with.
I wonder if we can make t/perf to behave more similar to the normal test suite to eliminate the need for this exporting, by the way. t/perf/README does not say anything more than "for lack of better options" throughout its history, which does not help very much.
