Hi Junio,
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes: > > > ... and even go so far as calling your patch reverting my refactoring > > a hot-fix, why don't you just go ahead and merge the result over my > > objections? > > At this point, you are simply being silly. How is it that this patch cannot be applied when, and if, that hypothetical config setting is introduced? Maybe I am dense here, but I would really like to know why this preparatory patch must be applied *now*, when there is nothing to prepare for. > Isn't "Putty is not a command but is also handled as if it is a valid > implementation of SSH" a bug? If you think it is a bug to handle an ssh command called "putty" as if it were plink, sure. I do not think there is a valid use case, but hey. Ciao, Johannes
