Hi René, On Sat, 28 Jan 2017, René Scharfe wrote:
> Exchange the values of graph->columns and graph->new_columns using the > macro SWAP instead of hand-rolled code. The result is shorter and > easier to read. > > This transformation was not done by the semantic patch swap.cocci > because there's an unrelated statement between the second and the last > step of the exchange, so it didn't match the expected pattern. Is it really true that Coccinelle cannot be told to look for a code block that declares a variable that is then used *only* in the lines we want to match and replace? I never used the tool, and a quick web search did not clarify the picture, either... Ciao, Dscho
