Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: >> > +# On the receiving end, "index-pack --fix-thin" will >> > +# complete the pack with a base copy of tree X-1. >> >> blob? tree? I think the argument would work the same way for either >> type of objects, but the previous paragraph is using blob as the >> example, so s/tree/blob/ here? > > Oops, yes. I had originally sketched out the example to use trees, but > it was easier to assemble with blobs so I switched (I never actually dug > into my "wild" case to see what it was segfaulting on, but I agree it > applies equally well to either).
OK, then I'll squash in s/tree/blob/ here, in addition to the "my" thing. Thanks.
