Hi, On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jan 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > I haven't spent enough time to think if it even makes sense to > > "stash" partially, leaving the working tree still dirty. > > Think no more! We already support that with --keep-index, and it is a very > useful feature. And of course there is `git stash -p`, which is also very useful, *because* it leaves the working tree still dirty, in the desired way. Ciao, Johannes
