W dniu 08.11.2016 o 21:12, Karthik Nayak pisze:
> From: Karthik Nayak <karthik....@gmail.com>
>
> Since there are multiple atoms which print refs ('%(refname)',
> '%(symref)', '%(push)', '%upstream'), it makes sense to have a common
Minor typo; it should be: "%(upstream)"
> ground for parsing them. This would allow us to share implementations of
> the atom modifiers between these atoms.
>
> Introduce refname_atom_parser_internal() to act as a common parsing
> function for ref printing atoms. This would eventually be used to
> introduce refname_atom_parser() and symref_atom_parser() and also be
> internally used in remote_ref_atom_parser().
>
> Helped-by: Jeff King <p...@peff.net>
> Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik....@gmail.com>
> ---
[...]
> +static void refname_atom_parser_internal(struct refname_atom *atom,
> + const char *arg, const char *name)
> +{
> + if (!arg)
> + atom->option = R_NORMAL;
> + else if (!strcmp(arg, "short"))
> + atom->option = R_SHORT;
> + else if (skip_prefix(arg, "strip=", &arg)) {
> + atom->option = R_STRIP;
> + if (strtoul_ui(arg, 10, &atom->strip) || atom->strip <= 0)
> + die(_("positive value expected refname:strip=%s"), arg);
> + } else
^^^^^^
It looks like you have spurious tab here.
> + die(_("unrecognized %%(%s) argument: %s"), name, arg);
> +}
> +
> static void remote_ref_atom_parser(struct used_atom *atom, const char *arg)
> {
> struct string_list params = STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP;
>
