On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> David Turner <david.tur...@twosigma.com> writes:
>
>>> -            "-u",
>> ...
>>> +    argv_array_pushl(&cp.args, "status", "--porcelain", "-uall",
>>
>> This also changes -u to -uall, which is not mentioned in the
>> commit message.  That should probably be called out.
>
> Or not making that change at all.  Isn't "-u" the same as "-uall"?

Yes it is.  My original line of thinking was to have it spelled out
clearly in case
it changes in the future, but then we could argue that the --porcelain parameter
ought to keep the default of -u to "all".

I'll undo that change then.

Thanks,
Stefan

Reply via email to