Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
> That's weird, we have this bit:
>
> + if (elem->whence != REV_CMD_REV && elem->whence !=
> REV_CMD_RIGHT)
> + continue;
>
> If I understand correctly that should cause it to only output revs
> (e.g. 'foo1') and the rhs side of a have..want spec.
If I remember right, '^foo1' is (whence == REV_CMD_REV) with (flags ==
UNINTERESTING). That's why sequencer.c checks for unadorned revs like
this:
if (opts->revs->cmdline.nr == 1 &&
opts->revs->cmdline.rev->whence == REV_CMD_REV &&
opts->revs->no_walk &&
!opts->revs->cmdline.rev->flags) {
Maybe
if (elem->flags & UNINTERESTING)
continue;
if (elem->whence == REV_CMD_PARENTS_ONLY) /* foo^@ */
continue;
would work well here? That would handle bizarre cases like "--not
next..master" (and ordinary cases like "master...next") better, by
focusing on the semantics instead of syntax.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
