Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:12 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: >>> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclo...@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> --- >>>> v2 changes just the subject line >>> >>> That's not sufficient, is it? What you did in the documentation >>> would raise the same "Hmph, is this only about HEAD?" and unlike the >>> commit subject, it will carve it in stone for end-users. >> >> Oops. I forgot about git-rebase.txt. How about this? >> >> --forget:: >> Abort the rebase operation but leave HEAD, the index and >> working tree untouched. > > Or, since --abort describes it as "reset HEAD to the original branch", > we could write "Abort the rebase operation. Unlike --abort, HEAD is > not restored back to the original branch". Index and worktree are > implied by "not restored". Not sure if it's too subtle.
I think you are moving in the right direction, even though "Abort it; unlike --abort, does this instead" is a bit hard to follow.
