On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > Johannes Sixt <j...@kdbg.org> writes: > >> Another problem with the proposed patch is that there is no >> declaration for attr_start() before the call in compat/mingw.c. We >> would have to move the declaration of attr_start() to cache.h (for >> example), because #including attr.h in compat/mingw.c is plainly >> wrong. However, it would not be a major offense to #include attr.h in >> common-main.c. But when we do that, we can certainly spare the few >> cycles to call pthread_mutex_init. > > That sounds like a good argument to have it in common-main.c.
If we're going that route, I would get rid of PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITILIZER and call a pthread_mutex_init platform independently. > > Would it mean that the code that defines the mutex needs to have > #ifdef that defines a no-op attr_start() and defines the mutex with > PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITILIZER with #else that just defines the mutex > without initializatin, with the real attr_start(), though?
