Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes: > Ok. The first 2 patches are in good shape for this cycle, though.
I thought both of you knew we are in agreement on that by now, but yes, the off-by-one fix needs to be in the upcoming release. > So maybe instead of adding !MINGW we rather want to apply > https://public-inbox.org/git/2908451e-4273-8826-8989-5572263cc...@kdbg.org/ > instead for now? That sounds good to me. The "/." thing we would want to come to agreement during the upcoming feature freeze and it would be very good if we can push the result out early in the next cycle, but I feel that it is premature for the upcoming release. Thanks.
