W dniu 04.10.2016 o 15:06, Johannes Schindelin pisze:
> The previous code still followed the old git-pull.sh code which did not
> adhere to our new convention.
Good to know why it used its own convention.
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de>
> ---
> builtin/pull.c | 2 +-
> wt-status.c | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/pull.c b/builtin/pull.c
> index c639167..0bf9802 100644
> --- a/builtin/pull.c
> +++ b/builtin/pull.c
> @@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ int cmd_pull(int argc, const char **argv, const char
> *prefix)
>
> if (!autostash)
> require_clean_work_tree(N_("pull with rebase"),
> - "Please commit or stash them.", 1, 0);
> + "please commit or stash them.", 1, 0);
>
Shouldn't those also be marked for translation with N_() or _()?
Best,
--
Jakub Narębski
