larsxschnei...@gmail.com writes:
> From: Lars Schneider <larsxschnei...@gmail.com>
>
> write_packetized_from_fd() and write_packetized_from_buf() write a
> stream of packets. All content packets use the maximal packet size
> except for the last one. After the last content packet a `flush` control
> packet is written.
>
> read_packetized_to_strbuf() reads arbitrary sized packets until it
> detects a `flush` packet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lars Schneider <larsxschnei...@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com>
> ---
> pkt-line.c | 69
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> pkt-line.h | 8 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 77 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/pkt-line.c b/pkt-line.c
> index 3fd4dc0..8ffde22 100644
> --- a/pkt-line.c
> +++ b/pkt-line.c
> @@ -196,6 +196,47 @@ void packet_buf_write(struct strbuf *buf, const char
> *fmt, ...)
> va_end(args);
> }
>
> +int write_packetized_from_fd(int fd_in, int fd_out)
> +{
> + static char buf[LARGE_PACKET_DATA_MAX];
> + int err = 0;
> + ssize_t bytes_to_write;
> +
> + while (!err) {
> + bytes_to_write = xread(fd_in, buf, sizeof(buf));
> + if (bytes_to_write < 0)
> + return COPY_READ_ERROR;
> + if (bytes_to_write == 0)
> + break;
> + err = packet_write_gently(fd_out, buf, bytes_to_write);
> + }
> + if (!err)
> + err = packet_flush_gently(fd_out);
> + return err;
> +}
OK.
> +int write_packetized_from_buf(const char *src_in, size_t len, int fd_out)
> +{
> + static char buf[LARGE_PACKET_DATA_MAX];
> + int err = 0;
> + size_t bytes_written = 0;
> + size_t bytes_to_write;
> +
> + while (!err) {
> + if ((len - bytes_written) > sizeof(buf))
> + bytes_to_write = sizeof(buf);
> + else
> + bytes_to_write = len - bytes_written;
> + if (bytes_to_write == 0)
> + break;
> + err = packet_write_gently(fd_out, src_in + bytes_written,
> bytes_to_write);
> + bytes_written += bytes_to_write;
> + }
> + if (!err)
> + err = packet_flush_gently(fd_out);
> + return err;
> +}
Hmph, what is buf[] used for, other than its sizeof() taken to yield
a constant LARGE_PACKET_DATA_MAX?
> @@ -305,3 +346,31 @@ char *packet_read_line_buf(char **src, size_t *src_len,
> int *dst_len)
> {
> return packet_read_line_generic(-1, src, src_len, dst_len);
> }
> +
> +ssize_t read_packetized_to_strbuf(int fd_in, struct strbuf *sb_out)
> +{
> + int packet_len;
> +
> + size_t orig_len = sb_out->len;
> + size_t orig_alloc = sb_out->alloc;
> +
> + for (;;) {
> + strbuf_grow(sb_out, LARGE_PACKET_DATA_MAX);
> + packet_len = packet_read(fd_in, NULL, NULL,
> + // TODO: explain + 1
No // C99 comment please.
And I agree that the +1 needs to be explained.
> + sb_out->buf + sb_out->len, LARGE_PACKET_DATA_MAX+1,
> + PACKET_READ_GENTLE_ON_EOF);
> + if (packet_len <= 0)
> + break;
Hmph. So at the end of a data stream, we ask packet_read() to read
64kB or so, packet_read() gets the packet length by calling
get_packet_data() and then another get_packet_data() reads that much
and return. What happens during the next round? The first call to
get_packet_data() in packet_read() will find that the stream has
ended and returns -1, which is stored in packet_len here? But then
the data is discarded after the loop when packet_len is negative.
I must be missing something. Is the other side always supposed to
give a flush packet or something? Perhaps that is what is happening
here. If so, I am OK with that, even though it somehow sounds a bit
wasteful.
