Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 07:31:35AM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote: > >> Right. But we should really be doing something like this instead to save a >> few subprocesses. >> [...] >> - eval "$(set_ident AUTHOR <../commit)" || >> + eval "$(set_ident AUTHOR author <../commit)" || > > I cringe a little at losing DRY-ness to avoid processes.
Well, the header field token "author" and the middle word of the variable GIT_AUTHOR_NAME _happen_ to be the same modulo case, but they did not have to be, so you could argue the updated set_ident implementation is more generally useful (you could even argue that we should spell the first parameter out as "GIT_AUTHOR_NAME" and "GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL", two separate parameters). > Speaking of repetition, this seems like almost the exact same parsing > that happens in git-sh-setup's get_author_ident_from_commit. Maybe it's > worth merging them. I suspect you could also avoid another process > by parsing out both author and committer information in the same sed > invocation. Yes, yes and yes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
