Hi Junio, On Sun, 11 Sep 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes: > > > Interactive rebase's scripts may be indented; we need to handle this > > case, too, now that we prepare the sequencer to process interactive > > rebases. > > Hmph, have we ever given the sequencer instructions indented to the > user to edit? No. We also never provide the user with an indented todo script in the sequencer. Yet we still parse it. Because Postel's Law. > I do not offhand see why we want to be lenient here, > especially only to the left. Postel's Law. We do not care about the right: that's only comments (onelines, for the users' pleasure). Ciao, Dscho
