Lars Schneider <larsxschnei...@gmail.com> writes: >> On 25 Aug 2016, at 21:17, Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 4:07 AM, <larsxschnei...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> From: Lars Schneider <larsxschnei...@gmail.com> >>> >>> Generate more interesting large test files >> >> How are the large test files more interesting? >> (interesting in the notion of covering more potential bugs? >> easier to debug? better to maintain, or just a pleasant read?) > > The old large test file was 1MB of zeros and 1 byte with a one, repeated 2048 > times. > > Since the filter uses 64k packets we would test a large number of equally > looking packets. > > That's why I thought the pseudo random content is more interesting.
I guess my real question is why it is not just a single invocation of test-genrandom that gives you the whole test file; if you are using 20MB, the simplest would be to grab 20MB out of test-genrandom. With that hopefully you won't see large number of equally looking packets, no?
