On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:03 AM, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 08:26:26PM +0200, Øystein Walle wrote: > >> In the mean time, however, I have discovered that this conflicts with >> kn/ref-filter-branch-list in pu. In that topic this specific feature is >> implemented as well. They incorporate it into %(upstream:track) instead >> of having a separate "sub-atom" (what's the correct nomenclature, by the >> way?) more in line with with branch -vv and your idea. >
I'm thinking more on the lines of `%(upstream)` being an atom and the `:track` being an option under that atom. I like sub-atom though ;) > Ah, right. I was feeling like this was all vaguely familiar. I think it > would be better to push forward kn/ref-filter-branch-list. According to > the last "what's cooking", I think that topic is waiting on more review. > If you're willing and able to do so, that would be a big help. > It's been waiting for review for a _long_ time now. -- Regards, Karthik Nayak -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
