Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes: > "you did ask me to use alternates once and for all when setting up the > superproject: now for this added submodule I don't find the alternate; > That is strange?"
Absolutely. I do not think you should expect a user to remember if s/he used alternates when getting a copy of the superproject long time ago. Giving "info: using from ..." is good; giving "warning: not using from ..." is probably irritating, I would think. Stepping back a bit, when the user says --reference-if-able, does it warrant any warning either way? I.e. "we made it borrow from there, so be careful not to trash that one" may be just as warning-worthy (if not even more) as "you said we can borrow from there if there is anything to borrow, but it turns out there isn't any, so the result is complete stand-alone." It feels as if we can go without any warning at least from "git clone --reference-if-able", unless "-v" option is given. I have a very strong opinion what should happen when the end-user facing command is "git submodule", but if I have to choose, I would prefer to see "git submodule update" tell what it did with "info:" either case, i.e. "info: borrowing from ... because the superproject borrows from there", and "info: not borrowing from ... even though the superproject borrows from there". -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
