Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> writes:
> Thomas Rast <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> diff --git i/commit.c w/commit.c
>> index 65a8485..70427ab 100644
>> --- i/commit.c
>> +++ w/commit.c
>> @@ -837,10 +837,13 @@ int in_merge_bases(struct commit *commit, struct
>> commit **reference, int num)
>> struct commit_list *bases, *b;
>> int ret = 0;
>>
>> - if (num == 1)
>> - bases = get_merge_bases(commit, *reference, 1);
>> - else
>> + if (num != 1)
>> die("not yet");
>> +
>> + bases = merge_bases_many(commit, 1, reference);
>> + clear_commit_marks(commit, all_flags);
>> + clear_commit_marks(*reference, all_flags);
>> +
>> for (b = bases; b; b = b->next) {
>> if (!hashcmp(commit->object.sha1, b->item->object.sha1)) {
>> ret = 1;
>
> This ended up being part of the series I sent earlier, and I want to
> assign authorship to you. As you did this as part of the discussion,
> naturally the patch came without a sign-off. Can we consider it
> signed off? Just saying "ok" is fine.
Sure:
ok
;-)
I'm also mildly surprised that it ended up being correct, albeit with
some extra work from you :-)
--
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
