On 08/23/2012 10:39 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:10:29AM +0200, mhag...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
>
>> From: Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu>
>>
>> Use the names (nr_heads, heads) consistently across functions, instead
>> of sometimes naming the same values (nr_match, match).
>
> I think this is fine, although:
>
>> --- a/builtin/fetch-pack.c
>> +++ b/builtin/fetch-pack.c
>> @@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ static void mark_recent_complete_commits(unsigned long
>> cutoff)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -static void filter_refs(struct ref **refs, int nr_match, char **match)
>> +static void filter_refs(struct ref **refs, int nr_heads, char **heads)
>> {
>> struct ref **return_refs;
>> struct ref *newlist = NULL;
>> @@ -530,12 +530,12 @@ static void filter_refs(struct ref **refs, int
>> nr_match, char **match)
>> struct ref *fastarray[32];
>> int match_pos;
>
> This match_pos is an index into the "match" array, which becomes "head".
> Should it become head_pos?
>
> And then bits like this:
>
>> - while (match_pos < nr_match) {
>> - cmp = strcmp(ref->name, match[match_pos]);
>> + while (match_pos < nr_heads) {
>> + cmp = strcmp(ref->name, heads[match_pos]);
>
> Would be:
>
> while (head_pos < nr_heads)
>
> which makes more sense to me.
I was up in the air about this, because match_pos *is* the position at
which a match is attempted. But since the name also strikes you as
wrong, I will change it in the next version.
Thanks for this and all of your other comments!
Michael
--
Michael Haggerty
mhag...@alum.mit.edu
http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
