On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 09:46:22AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Maybe you could introduce "test_seq" instead. > > > > I don't have a strong preference, as there are only two callsites. Do > > you want to make a patch? > > If you run "for . in . . ." in t/, we see quite a many hits, so > "only two callsites" might be undercounting the candidates.
True. Although a good number of them are not numeric sequences (however perl being perl, I think my one-liner would take "a" and "g" as end-points just as readily). I have no problem with converting them all. I just didn't want to personally go to the work myself. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
