Eric Wong <normalper...@yhbt.net> writes: > Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Thanks from me as well. I'm still worried about whether the increased >> use of canonicalize_url will introduce regressions for the existing >> SVN 1.6 support, and I should have time to look it over this weekend. >> >> The comment in canonicalize_url "There wasn't a 1.6 way to do it" is >> not true. The relevant thread on the git list had a little >> conversation about keeping svn 1.4 support, but I'm not sure why >> that's relevant, given that svn_canonicalize_path has worked largely >> the same way starting with SVN 1.1 (and on the other hand had >> significant changes in SVN 1.7). >> >> Hopefully you've looked this over carefully already and I'm worrying >> needlessly. > > Thanks for reminding me, I went back to an old chroot 1.4.2 indeed > does fail canonicalization. > > Will bisect and squash a fix in.
Oops; should I eject this out of next and wait for a reroll, then? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
