Michael G. Schwern wrote:
> Rather than guess what SVN is going to do for each version, make the test use
> the branch name that was actually created.
[...]
> - git rev-parse "refs/remotes/not-a%40{0}reflog"
> + git rev-parse "refs/remotes/$non_reflog"
Doesn't this defeat the point of the testcase (checking that git-svn
is able to avoid creating git refs containing @{, following the rules
from git-check-ref-format(1))?
Do you know when SVN truncates the directory name? Would historical
SVN repositories or historical SVN servers be able to have a directory
named with a %40 in it, or has this been disallowed completely,
leaving problematic historical repositories to be dumped with old SVN,
tweaked, and reloaded with new SVN?
Thanks,
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
