Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Agreed, except that git-convert-cache and git-fsck-cache actually have > nothing to do this the index by any name, and should probably be > git-convert-objects and git-fsck-objects.
You are right. > I think "fetch" is more applicable to what they do. OK. then they are git-http-fetch and friends. How about git-ssh-push? The counterpart of fetch-pack/clone-pack is called upload-pack, so would git-ssh-upload make things more consistent? I dunno. > I don't think it matters very much whether something is a script or not; > on the other hand, it would be good to have "git" list a reasonable set of > commands to use through the interface, which would exclude, for example, > git-merge-one-file-script, and include the above commands. Are you suggesting to drop -script from git-merge-one-file? Then git-cherry should perhaps keep its current name. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
