Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In the "central repo model" you have another issue - you have potentially > parallell pushes to different branches with no locking what-so-ever (and > that's definitely _supposed_ to work), and I have this suspicion that the > "update for dumb servers" code isn't really safe in that setting anyway. I > haven't checked.
You are absolutely right. It should grab some sort of lock while it does its thing (would fcntl(F_GETLK) be acceptable to networked filesystem folks?). I have one question regarding the hooks. We seem to prefer avoiding system and roll our own. Is there a particular reason, other than bypassing the need to quote parameters for shell? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
