On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 09:34:33PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > Of course, if you want to create a new branch "my-branch" and _not_ > > check it out, you could have done so with just > > > > git-rev-parse v2.6.12^0 > .git/refs/heads/my-branch > > > > which I think I will codify as "git branch". > > And now we have that "git branch". It's a trivial one-liner, except with > the setup and error checking it's actually more like six lines.
Does it make sense to think about this branch as an flow of commits? Or is it just a starting point for a line of development? If I make a branch, check it out, commit changes to it, and then clobber the working directory, can I later resume that branch of development without creating a new branch? Do I need to set a tag to mark the last commit on that branch? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
