On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 00:42 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 04:31:43PM CEST, I got a letter > where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > Hi, > > Hi, > > > I understand why you have the git-pasky-0.6.x.tar.bz2 tarballs with > > the .git database included as well (btw, great stuff renaming it to > > something more distributable), but its going to be a pita for users of > > source based distro's like us (Gentoo), as well as our mirrors if it > > gets much bigger. (Already asked r3pek to add it to portage). > > yes; that was actually the plan, it's just that my memory is so > volatile... >
Yep, saw before you posted about the change in URL, thanks. > > How about ripping the .git directory from the next release, and just > > have a un-numbered tarball (like you used to) that have the latest > > snapshot of the .git directory for those that want to do git-pasky > > development? Should even make things easier your side, as you could > > just do a cron to update it one a day/whatever. > > Does it actually make sense to keep a tarball with history? Just build > git-pasky and do git init. (Or rsync it manually.) > Well, I did not know about kernel.org hosting it, so I thought it might help due to your reasons for initially tarballing the whole thing =) Thanks, -- Martin Schlemmer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
