>>>>> "Petr" == Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Petr> Perhaps it would be useful to have some "command classes" (with at least Petr> cg-*-(add|ls|rm)), like: Petr> cg-branch-ls Petr> cg-remote-rm Petr> cg-tag-add Just speaking of consistency, can we make it so that all the commands are just variations with out the damm dashes in them? Something like: git lsbranch git lstag ... Or something mildly along those lines. I don't even care what ORDER they are, whether the 'ls' comes before or after the object type it works on. But make it the same every where, so that ls, rm, add, check, foo, barzle, ... all use the same format. Makes it much much easier to extrapolate what command syntax to use when new objects to be acted upon are added. Does a standard like: git <objecttype> <command> <args> [<obj> ...] make sense? Easy to script, easy to remember. Even munging <objtype><command> into a single word is ok. John - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
