On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 15:17:50 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote: | | | On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, David Woodhouse wrote: | > | > Do you want the commits list running for it yet? Do you want the | > changesets which are already in it re-mailed without a 'TESTING' tag? | | I really don't know. I'm actually very happy where this thing is right | now, and completing that first merge successfully was a big milestone to | me personally. That said, actually _using_ this thing is not for the | faint-of-heart, and while I think "git" already is showing itself to be | useful, I'm very very biased. | | In other words, I really wonder what an outsider that doesn't have the | same kind of mental bias thinks of the current git tree. Is it useful, or | is it still just a toy for Linus to test out his crazy SCM-wannabe. | | Can people usefully track my current kernel git repository, or do you have | to be crazy to do so? That's really the question. You be the judge. Me, | I'm just giddy from a merge that was clearly done using interfaces that | aren't actually really usable for anybody but me, and barely me at that ;)
TBD... | Linus | | Btw, I also do want this to show up in the BK trees for people who use | BitKeeper - the same way we always supported tar-ball + patch users | before. So I'll have to try to come up with some sane way to do that too. | Any ideas? The first series of 198 patches is obvious enough and can be | just done that way direcly, but the merge.. David did the commits-mailing-list script and I'm working on a commits web-page like what was formerly seen at: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/cset/ (with daily tarball) based on some older scripts from David, however I'm wondering if a variant of the gitlog.sh script wouldn't be a better starting point for it. --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
