On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 01:07 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 01:04:50AM CEST, I got a letter > where Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > Rather use checkout-cache to sync our tree, as should do the right thing > > instead of diffing (cancel imply just blow away everything). > > > > Signed-off-by: Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > gitcancel.sh: 839b3c58f20f6eb8412f499a891e007e2e67d114 > > --- 839b3c58f20f6eb8412f499a891e007e2e67d114/gitcancel.sh > > +++ uncommitted/gitcancel.sh > > @@ -10,9 +10,8 @@ > > # > > # Takes no arguments. Takes the evil changes from the tree. > > > > -# FIXME: Does not revert mode changes! > > > > -show-diff | patch -p0 -R > > rm -f .git/add-queue .git/rm-queue > > +checkout-cache -q -f -a > > > > update-cache --refresh > > Why -q? > > Never make things silent unless you really know what are you doing and > why. The same goes for popular throwing of -f to rm's of files which > should always exist or 2>/dev/null for cats. >
Uhm, no particular reason (other than perhaps working usually on stuff where too much info just confuses the user). If its fine in spirit, the -q can go. -- Martin Schlemmer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
