That's the conclusion I came to as well. I am still figuring out how to do raw CR2 files, but the script below does handle multi-page TIFFs just fine. It's a PowerShell (Windows) wrapper around ImageMagick. Not elegant, and the formatting on blogger kinda sucks (I'll fix that someday), but here it is:
http://disassemblyrequired.blogspot.com/2010/06/powershell-and-imagemagick.html <http://disassemblyrequired.blogspot.com/2010/06/powershell-and-imagemagick.html>The magick all happens with this single command: - convert image[0].tif image.xcf Nice. On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Deniz Dogan <deniz.a.m.do...@gmail.com>wrote: > 2010/6/6 Dillon <dillonontheco...@gmail.com>: > > Someone off-list suggested ImageMagick. Some googling shows this > command: > > convert mulitple.tif single%d.tif > > > > I think this will create multiple files, each representing a page from > the > > tif. > > Since I planned on wrapping all my script-fu in PowerShell, I could > insert a > > call to imagemagick to create a temp folder of split-up TIFs, which my > > script-fu could convert to XCF. > > I'd rather do the whole thing in script-fu, as I anticipate doing some > > filtering and stuff via GIMP. > > If I start down the ImageMagick route, I may just go with a > > PowerShell/ImageMagick approach and leave out the script-fu. > > Any strong suggestions on going one way or the other? I'll still do all > my > > manual editing in GIMP, but maybe not any of the batch work ... > > I personally don't think there's much of an advantage using Script-Fu > as opposed to ImageMagick when it comes to batch processing. > ImageMagick is widely used in all kinds of applications. It also has > an abundance of filtering capabilities that you can easily use. > > That being said, I'm neither an ImageMagick wizard nor a Script-Fu/GIMP > one. > > -- > Deniz Dogan >
_______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
