[Repost after a list resurrection] On 2009-09-19, Jason van Gumster <ja...@handturkeystudios.com> wrote: >> Suggestion: Would it be possible as you "walk" the path, to compare each >> pixel to prior and if they are the "same" to within the threshold >> tolerance skip that pixel and proceed to next? My theory being that if >> two adjacent pixels on a path are within "threshold tolerance" of each >> other then fuzzy select on either is the same as fuzzy select on both. > > Even more simple: Couldn't you use gimp-selection-value to test whether the > specified pixel is already in the current selection as you walk the path? If > it > is, then you can skip that pixel and move on to the next one.
If you do not mind that the result is going to be majorly different - maybe. *I* think that for best result, one needs an additional *relative* threshold. E.g., if main threshold is 12, and relative is 30%, then one would skip pixels which differ from a preceeding one by less than about 4. If this relative threshold is close to 100% (which is essentially what you recommend), then the result will be quite different comparing to one with low threshold. Yours, Ilya _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
