On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 08:50:12PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Very clear. > Thanks for a so clear and energizing answer Simon ! > It's full of good things even if you warn us about the time it can take. > Topic almost closed for me... > > Sincerely. > > > What happens *after* Gimp 2.4 has been released will go more along the > > lines you mention. We'll have great changes in the infrastructure (see > > pippins link to GEGL) which makes things like adjustment layers or even > > direct effects possible. However, it will be quite some time until this > > 2.5 development series results in the next stable 2.6 or even 3.0. > > > i would like to make this one request. that is that the ettiquette that is described on www.gimp.org about how mail to this list is formatted be at least attempted: http://www.gimp.org/mail_lists.html
i am very sorry that the page has been formated in a way that you have to scroll the page to read the ettiquette which has been suggested there. it has been my experience that even an honest attempt to not top-post emails to this list will be appreciated. i understand that everyone has different expectations of emails and such and i equally appreciate the time that is spent by you to at least consider this. thanks, carol _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
