Ross Brown wrote: > If Gimp is to become a replacement for Photoshop then, whether it > appears to be "good practice" or not, it has to accommodate its > potential users and work as they are used to working (in the short > term at least). I'm sure there are many people who will argue - and > possible quite rightly - that the Gimp is not a Photoshop replacement > but, for many, many people, it is and as more people make the move > from Photoshop, surely the Gimp's relevancy, exposure and quality can > only improve. I think you make a great point but I don't think improvements in Gimp's quality or relevance is based on or related to PhotoShop user acceptance at all.
Peace... Tom _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
