John R. Culleton wrote: > > Not at all. I was noting that on two different flavors of linux > it is necessary to download and install material beyond that > contained in the Gimp download in order to get it to compile. And > that wasn't true in prior versions. Perhaps the missing module > should be put in with the Gimp tarball if that is legal and > practical.
That suggestion would imply that all dependencies be packaged which is nonsense! Owen _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
