i think you'll find somewhere in GPL you cant distribute it under another
name and have no reference to GPL on the site
and if this is the way GPL works you need to seriously rethink it
From: <pcg( Marc)@goof(A.).(Lehmann )com>
To: steve hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP RENAMED and sold on eBay
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:50:31 +0100
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 11:45:13AM +0100, Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> "free" refers to the terms that source code is distributed at no extra
> charge and with full modification rights, not to the actual price.
Actually, the GPL FAQ says:
Does the GPL allow me to charge a fee for downloading the program
from my site?
Yes. You can charge any fee you wish for distributing a copy of the
program. If you distribute binaries by download, you must provide
"equivalent access" to download the source--therefore, the fee to
download source may not be greater than the fee to download the
binary.
--
The choice of a
-----==- _GNU_
----==-- _ generation Marc Lehmann
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / http://schmorp.de/
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE
_______________________________________________
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
