Hi, Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is there a reasonable way to provide more detail as to what > > GIMP is doing in a bug report? Reporting that GTK is failing > > when a 45MB jpg file is expanded to 500MB+ is perhaps a bit too > > generic. It would be nice to say it was in routine XXXX. > > It's actually not (that) unusual that the GIMP would take 500M of > memory for a 45M jpeg. Some plug-ins (for example PSD) are implemented quite badly and allocate a block of memory large enough to hold the full data of the uncompressed layer. But as far as I know, the JPEG plug-in does it the right way and only allocates relatively few memory. There could however very well be a bug in the implementation. Sven _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
