Hi, > > That's stuff that can be done in the GGI target, which means this is > > transparently to the GGI application. :) > > Which is what I'm saying: let do it to the kgi target, not to the > application. >
That has been the intention the entire time. Nobody expected users to handle these signals themselves. No target (no matter how superior :) should require ggi applications to insert code specifically for them--that goes against the whole design of ggi. This discussion is going in circles and for no good reason. Paul
