Oh, no, not that again ...! ;-) Yet it must be. Christoph Egger on Friday 13 December 2002 21:24: > Wann wird -rc5 ueberhaupt via aptget downloadbar?
Packages are ready. I haven't uploaded, 'cause i don't like them yet. All that strange names ... On Saturday 14 December 2002 02:35, Andreas Beck wrote: > > 2. LibWMH is totally broken for me. This seems to be a binary > > compatibility issue, as the demo runs fine. > > O.K. - got that one. Library name changed from libggiwmh to libwmh. > > I am usure what I prefer. However for compatibilty reasons I would > suggest to place symlinks to emulate the old name libggiwmh for some > time. No, this looks nice, i'm sure what i prefer! That's what i like. libggimisc already exists like that, source, binary and libname are identical - that's the way to go! IMHO publishing these libs of yours with that generic names will not work in the long run at least. So, why don't you just do _that_?: call it libggiwmh, libggiovl, ... leaving gii and ggi itself like they are. Do it, i need one hour to redo the packaging and off it goes ... :) Please consider it. (Still ;) have a nice day, martin -- Use dselect for user-friendly package management
