Hello, All!

Forgot to mention the Cc in my post to debian-develop, sorry, might be 
you receive some mail wrt. to our future in the next days.


Somebody who objects naming the *Source* packages of all your wonderful 
libs *in the Debian archive* to ggi-libraryname (eg.: ggi-libwmh, 
ggi-piggy)? That is because piggy seems so generic :), also does libgpf.

(In the process of writing the description for wmh: it pulls me to use 
libggi-libwmh as the source name instead of ggi-libwmh, or -extwmh? and 
the binary?: is libggi-extwmh, might be libggi-ext-wmh, or ggi-ext-wmh 
or what? See? Pls. help me out ;) My (current) prefs: src:ggi-libwmh, 
libggi-ext-wmh-x (shortest, meets libggi-{sample,target}s-, but may be 
libggi2-ext-wmh1-target-x might be more descriptive/correct/necessary?)


I _love_ systems, but why is gpf an *extension* vs. lib? (sorry for 
that, but sometimes its a little much for my poor head to stretch from 
GGI(packages) on bloated user pc's, over embeddian down to autogens', 
licenses all on the way, back through the Gate Great Interface - "don't 
stay too long, don't hang around, get back to apt!"

Aahh, yes, and back we are ;)


Somebody who objects naming the *Binary* packages of all your wonderful 
libs *in the Debian archive* to libggi-libname and libggi-extname (this 
is not as generic as the Source thing, there are already eg. 
libggi-target-fbdev, libggi-samples)? libggi-ext-name? Looks better, 
adds another char to the length ...


As always, 'historical reasons' can be given, when 'libgii', 'libggi', 
and 'svgalib4libggi' should live on with these names for their *source* 
packages. I'd rename existing libggimisc to any scheme and keep those 
names: gii, ggi don't need libggi :P and svgalib is, well, svgalib.

Have a nice GGI :-), martin

PS. I can talk about that naming thing even longer, wanting it to be as 
general as can be and with least DPI changes (Debian Package 
Interface:) as possible (the collected list of Replaces and Conflicts 
becomes harder to manage everytime). If someone wants to start ...?

-- 
Use dselect for user-friendly package management

Reply via email to