On Sat, 27 Nov 1999, Andreas Beck wrote:
> > Isn't the ramdac clock always the same as the pixel clock?
>
> Not quite, depending on the exact definition of pixel clock.
> Using doubling-capabilities of the chipset, it may well be, that the
> programmed clock of the clock systhesizer is higher than what the ramdac
> gets. However it might as well be, that the ramdac is still driven at the
> high frequency, just getting allways the same pixel twice. Depends on
> implementation.
IC, you mean the pixel doubling on some S3s?
But if the RAMDAC clock is different from the pixel clock, it's something to be
managed by the driver internally, right?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- Linux/{m68k~Amiga,PPC~CHRP} -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
