Re: GGI game programming

[Jay]

Ok, from now on lets call all "textures" "pigments"

Club Neon wrote:

> Jay wrote:
>
> > I don't know why they do it. I personaly agree, it shouldn't be done. I also think
> > bumpmapping shouldn't be done (it should also be done in geomerty), but I guess we
> > really couldn't call it a "texture" then :-) Lets start a trend. Lets make up a 
>name
> > for "textures" that doesn't imply the need for this various bull crap above. Lets
> > make it basicly mean "picture that is maped on to a 3D solid." Does anybody have a
> > word like that?
>
> I grew up in POV-Ray, it seperated the different parts of the "texture"
> into logical divisions, they called the part you are talking about
> "pigment".
>
> -Chris