On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Rub�n wrote:
> On 1999/Oct/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > The difference between both methods is, that the copybox update, whereever
> > it occurs blends smoothly with the old picture, while a change of the
> > panning registers can cause the picture generation to be messed up.
>
> Ah, ok, well, it does what I want, its enough for me. Anyway, I will
> continue reading docs and learning how to include vertical retrace support
> into KGIcon, it's best (I have readed the GGI tech. docs, and it seems to be
> a bit difficult).
>
> > > I've tested it and it's REALLY nice, now my 3D cube rotates really
> > > smooth !
> >
> > 3D cube ? BTW - if you are into demo coding ... - have you tried the cube3d
>
> I'm still porting 3D routines from DOS to Linux, I have finished
> flat and gouraud, and will start with zbuffer. And a Cube is the easyest
> way, IMHO, for finding bugs in the ported routines, it isn't the demo itself
> :-D
Z-Buffer? Flat- Gouraud-shading? I assume you haven't tried my 3DtoolKit.
It supports flat, gouraud, z-buffer, textures, alpha-blending,
colored lights...
I suggest, you should test my Lib before you continue coding with your lib
to avoid _double_ working!
Two screenshots are available at
ftp://ftp.ggi-project.org/pub/ggi/misc/3dtk/screenshot/
Christoph Egger
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
