I am working on my spring semester lesson plans for classes on Law and
Policy.
I am looking for a good example of a concept that will be presented.
One of the objections that intelligent conservatives make to our current
system of environmental laws (at least in the United States) is that it
does not balance technical expertise and democratic accountability.
They argue that only trained technocrats with specialized knowledge are
qualified to write regulations but everyone in a democracy must have the
right to participate in the process.
Of course when a new regulation is proposed, there is a comment period
and the agency proposing the regulation makes every effort to engage
stakeholders. The intelligent conservative often believes that these
measures are not sufficient, hence the objections.
So, can anyone suggest a situation where technocratic expertise and
democratic accountability have been in a legitimate conflict?
The conservatives will argue that there are plenty of examples of
regulatory over reach.
Compact fluorescent light bulbs? They save 75% of the electricity
used for lighting
Can't drive my car on the beach anymore? Nesting seabirds are an
important part of the ecosystem
Can't build my new house within 300 feet of a creek? Ever hear of
runoff pollution?
Every example I try to find for my lesson plans seems to suggest that
There Is No Such Thing As Regulatory Over Reach.....or perhaps it would
be politically neutral to say that the vast majority regulations are
promulgated for very good reasons. And furthermore, the agency
proposing the regulation has had its power conferred by the legislative
branch.
There must be a good example where an environmental regulation has come
into a legitimate conflict with the democratic process.
Full disclosure, I am of course a tree-hugging, Union Dues paying
lifelong Democrat. (Maybe that is why I am struggling with this question)
Happy Thanksgiving to the List Subscribers in the United States,
Thank you,
Kevin
--
“Of all the inanimate objects, of all men's creations, books are the nearest to
us for they contain our very thoughts, our ambitions, our indignations, our
illusions, our fidelity to the truth, and our persistent leanings to error. But
most of all they resemble us in their precious hold on life.”
― Joseph Conrad
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"gep-ed" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gep-ed/b04a14b5-c5de-f0c7-e433-f7ef01cecf77%40montclair.edu.
