Two thoughts from my home town of Wayne, New Jersey

The town had an EPA Superfund site. Back in the 1980s no one knew how dangerous the situation was, no one knew what kind of remediation was being planned, why the soil spent several years sitting under a tarp, and where it was going to be sent, that is when and if a decision about the disposal would be made. Press reports about the site were filled with speculation.

Today a community with a Superfund site has a dedicated contact person at the EPA who will answer questions, talk to the press, and conduct meeting with the CAG or Community Advisory Group. For someone who remembers how the town stumbled around in the dark, the change is nothing short of miraculous.

--

Back in the bad old days when I would point out that our township was being developed faster than land could be preserved as parks and open space, people would look at me with something like pity. They would then begin explaining (slowly, as one would to a child) the importance of rateables in municipal tax rates. A few people would shake their heads sadly and agree with me but sighed in resignation.

Today there is widespread support for our local parks and even a very strong volunteer group at township's arboretum.


We must be doing something right.....

Kevin





On 4/8/2019 9:54 AM, Aslaug Asgeirsdottir wrote:
This may be tangentially relevant, but this project from the 1970s EPA could provide some clues:

https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/2009/spring/documerica.html

https://www.flickr.com/photos/usnationalarchives/collections/72157620729903309/

https://www.citylab.com/environment/2017/03/five-reasons-to-love-the-epa-before-it-disappears/518199/

https://academic.oup.com/envhis/article/23/1/106/4626615

All the best,

Áslaug

--------------------------------------------------

Áslaug Ásgeirsdóttir

Associate Dean of the Faculty and Professor of Politics
Pronouns: she, hers

120 Lane Hall
2 Andrews Road
Bates College
Lewiston, ME 04240

Phone: 207-786-6472
E-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>





On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 9:47 AM Michael Schoon <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hi All,

    In addition to Paul's list, there are a number of books that I use
    to talk about optimism in my sustainability classes.  As he notes
    in the above examples, they are often Pollyannish.  However,
    others are reasonably clear-eyed.  I use Gregg Easterbrook's "The
    Progress Paradox" and Pinker's "Enlightenment Now".  For
    interesting reads that often frustrate, there is Ridley's
    "Rational Optimist" and Diamandis's "Abundance".

    Also, if you haven't seen the research program "Seeds of a Good
    Anthropocene" from McGill University and Stockholm Resilience
    Center, it's worth taking a look (https://goodanthropocenes.net/).

    Hope that this is helpful.

    Mike
    Associate Professor
    School of Sustainability
    Arizona State University
    https://michaelschoon.com/


    On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 5:28 AM Paul Wapner <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Hi Beth,

        Perhaps the challenge of finding such a list rests on
        interpretation.  Many thinkers see good news everywhere,
        especially with environmental trends.  Folks like Bjorn
        Lomborg, Johan Norberg, Ronald Bailey, Deirdre McCloskey, and
        Anders Bolling are always presenting ‘facts’ that demonstrate
        environmental improvement.  Their work is controversial but
        persuasive to many.  It is part of a broader orientation that
        tends to be optimistic about humanity’s fate, seeing
        ‘progress’ everywhere.  I would put people like Steven Pinker,
        Hans Rosling, and the infamous Juliann Simon in this
        category.  The New York Times Book Review recently had a piece
        on Pinker and Rosling

        
https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2019/02/07/pinker-rosling-progress-accentuate-positive/.


        Aside from thinkers, there are a number of outfits that
        present ‘good’ environmental news, such as
        https://www.goodnewsnetwork.org/category/news/environment/,
        although I am unsure if they track broad trends.

        All the best,

        Paul

        Paul Wapner

        Professor, Global Environmental Politics

        School of International Service

        American University

        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

--
        *From: *Gepers <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of
        "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>"
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
        *Reply-To: *"[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
        *Date: *Saturday, April 6, 2019 at 3:14 PM
        *To: *Beth DeSombre <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>, Gepers
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
        *Subject: *RE: [gep-ed] Good environmental trends

        Hi Beth,

        I have seen, at some point in the past ten years, some sort of
        good news list. I cannot remember the source though I suspect
        it came over the Canadian Association of Geographers
        discussion list (you could post a query here:
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> .
        However, like one of your suggestions (better access to clean
        water), I remember finding at the time that the list only
        hailed purely anthropocentric improvements. As far as the
        state of the non-human world is concerned, I have the
        overwhelming sense that things are, across the board, going
        from bad to worse.

        I’d be happy to be proven wrong and look forward to your
        sharing your findings.

        Cheers,

        Bill

        *From:* [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> *On Behalf Of *Beth DeSombre
        *Sent:* April 6, 2019 11:31 AM
        *To:* GEP-Ed List <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
        *Subject:* [gep-ed] Good environmental trends

        Hi folks:

        This seems like a no brainer, but I'm having a surprisingly
        difficult time gathering a list of positive environmental
        trends (worldwide and over history). Things that have --
        because of human intervention -- unquestionably improved, with
        some specific details to hang on them. Things like improved
        access to clean water, better air quality (of various types)
        in many parts of the world, etc.

        I'd like to not reinvent the wheel -- I could easily come up
        with a list of things I think are better now environmentally
        than 50 (or 25) years ago and go fetch the details of each,
        but I'm certain that one or more sources has already outlined
        them, with specifics attached.

        Can someone point me towards such
        lists/overviews/compilations? (Happy to share suggestions with
        the group afterwards).

        Thanks,

        Beth

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
        Google Groups "gep-ed" group.
        To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
        it, send an email to [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>.
        For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
        
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_optout&d=DwMFaQ&c=U0G0XJAMhEk_X0GAGzCL7Q&r=BOzhaYdtrFx6b4S5xQEOnb05jR0rDHGlFyLMspvfa48&m=4WAElHRedlbXlxltWAHLZWS2iW0rH7h_NbEDzZYWf-A&s=IX0wyV-Ki-AxccsE91l2fc_ZnHCezrPrIyptx2uY9_Q&e=>.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
        Google Groups "gep-ed" group.
        To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
        it, send an email to [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>.
        For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
        
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_optout&d=DwMFaQ&c=U0G0XJAMhEk_X0GAGzCL7Q&r=BOzhaYdtrFx6b4S5xQEOnb05jR0rDHGlFyLMspvfa48&m=4WAElHRedlbXlxltWAHLZWS2iW0rH7h_NbEDzZYWf-A&s=IX0wyV-Ki-AxccsE91l2fc_ZnHCezrPrIyptx2uY9_Q&e=>.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
        Google Groups "gep-ed" group.
        To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
        it, send an email to [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>.
        For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
    Groups "gep-ed" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "gep-ed" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
My books and instruments shall be my company..

The Taming of the Shrew
Act one, scene four

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"gep-ed" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to