Here's another good source of analyses: http://www.ejolt.org/section/blog/ .
 Kathy

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Geoffrey Wandesforde-Smith <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Let me suggest the value of keeping an informal log of post-Rio+20
> analyses or assessments, and thank those who have already contributed
> items.   ****
>
> ** **
>
> In England, while Rio+20 was in progress, I noted a generally negative
> press for the conference across those British newspapers that bothered to
> report on Rio+20 at all.  In other recent online reports or post-mortems
> assessments are mixed but there is essentially scant good news.****
>
> ** **
>
> What happened and what, if anything, went wrong?  Where might one turn for
> some understanding of what the Rio+20 outcomes mean?  [Context: Geoffrey
> Wandesforde-Smith, *From Sleeping Treaties to the Giddy Insomnia of
> Global Governance: How International Wildlife Law Makes Headway*, 15 J.
> Int’l Wildlife L. & Pol’y 80-94 (2012).  PDF copy available on request].**
> **
>
> ** **
>
> Here’s the list I have at this point:****
>
> ** **
>
> *Chasek/IISD  *http://www.iisd.ca/uncsd/rio20/enb/* *
>
> * *
>
> Prideaux/MWN  http://wildmigration.org/newsletter.php?newsletter_select=29
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> James et al./CAP
> http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2012/06/rio_text.html****
>
> * *
>
> Halle/IISD  http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2012/com_life_after_rio.pdf****
>
> ** **
>
> Montague/TBIJ
> http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2012/06/22/analysis-rio-20-epic-fail/
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Dalkmann/WRI
> http://insights.wri.org/news/2012/06/rio20-rear-view-whats-road-ahead-sustainable-transportation
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Watts & Ford/The Guardian
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/jun/23/rio-20-earth-summit-document
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Romero & Broder/New York Times
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/jun/23/rio-20-earth-summit-document
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Monbiot/The Guardian
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jun/25/rio-governments-will-not-save-planet
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Beinecke & Van Noppen/New York Times
> http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/23/opinion/after-rio20-we-have-to-solve-the-earths-problems.html
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Vidal/The Guardian
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/poverty-matters/2012/jun/27/rio20-reasons-cheerful
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Chatterjee/CorpWatch  http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=15746 ****
>
> ** **
>
> Associated Press
> http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2012/06/23/world/americas/ap-lt-brazil-rio20-outcome.html
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> IUCN
> http://www.iucn.org/news_homepage/events/iucn___rio___20/on_the_road_to_rio__bonn_2011/?10227/20-years-on-civil-society-leads-in-Rio
> ****
>
> * *
>
> *Griffin/Bloomberg**  *
> http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-06-26/rio-20-on-the-same-planet-but-not-the-same-page.html
> * ***
>
> I hope others will suggest additional items for the list.  As time goes
> by, the analyses should get deeper and less reportorial.****
>
> Geoffrey.****
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ****
>
> Geoffrey Wandesforde-Smith****
>
> Emeritus Professor of Political Science****
>
> University of California, Davis.****
>
> Associate Editor, JIWLP.****
>



-- 
Kathleen McAfee
Associate Professor, International Relations
San Francisco State University

Reply via email to