i thought gep'ers might be interested in this item from the center for
progressive reform . . . 

cheers,

craig

craig k harris

department of sociology

michigan agricultural experiment station

national food safety and toxicology center

institute for food and agriculture standards

food safety policy center

michigan state university

 

From: Center for Progressive Reform [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 11:13 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: CPR White Paper: Ten Environmental Treaties the U.S. Should
Ratify

 

 <http://e2ma.net/oz/7454555397/208829293/1408174/spacer.gif>
<http://e2ma.net/oz/7454555397/208829293/1408174/spacer.gif> 

If you're having trouble viewing this email, you may see it online
<http://e2ma.net/map/view:CampaignPublic/id:1408174.7454555397/rid=0263d
b7495b386089bc71ac8d0b5b2aa> . 

 

Share This:
<http://social.e2ma.net/next/e/1408174/89a8db9c7d4217c6ab6c49438efd0a13/
7454555397/?mrid=0263db7495b386089bc71ac8d0b5b2aa> 

 <http://www.progressivereform.org/imgs/emailMastHeadNew.gif> 

Dear Center for Progressive Reform Supporter: 

Time was when the United States took the lead in organizing responses to
international environmental problems, as it did with global agreements
restricting trade in endangered species and protecting the world against
ozone depletion. But in the last two decades, our record has faltered,
perhaps most notoriously in the decision not to join the Kyoto Protocol,
but on a range of less publicized treaties, as well. 

The Center for Progressive Reform recently published Reclaiming Global
Environmental Leadership: Why the United States Should Ratify Ten
Pending Environmental Treaties
<http://e2ma.net/go/7454555397/208829293/230977080/1408174/goto:http:/ww
w.progressivereform.org/articles/International_Environmental_Treaties_12
01.pdf> . CPR Member Scholars Mary Jane Angelo, Rebecca Bratspies, David
Hunter, John H. Knox, Noah Sachs, and Sandra Zellmer teamed up to make
the case for a lesser-known group of treaties -- half signed by
Democratic presidents and half signed by Republican presidents. These
treaties have been pending an average of 13 years, awaiting
ratification. In most cases, the Senate must provide its advice and
consent by a two-thirds vote, and some treaties require implementing
legislation to be enacted by both houses of Congress. 

These international treaties were all negotiated with substantial U.S.
input, and they all provide clear benefits to the United States -- or
they would if only the United States ratified them. In one example, if
the United States responds to an oil spill in Antarctica, it has no
assurance that it will be repaid by the nation or company that caused
the problem. One of the pending treaties, the Antarctic Liability Annex,
provides a system through which those who respond to environmental
emergencies in Antarctica are compensated by those who cause them.
Because of its permanent base and its capacity to respond to emergencies
in the hostile Antarctic conditions, the U.S. government is far more
likely to receive payments than to make them in the event of an
environmental catastrophe. The Antarctic Liability Annex is in our
national interest. 

There's just no good reason for further congressional delay in acting on
these treaties, and plenty of reason to move ahead with dispatch. I hope
you find the paper interesting and informative. Thanks very much for
your continued support. 

Jake Caldwell
Executive Director
Center for Progressive Reform
www.progressivereform.org
<http://e2ma.net/go/7454555397/208829293/230977081/1408174/goto:http:/ww
w.progressivereform.org/>  
www.progressivereform.org/CPRblog
<http://e2ma.net/go/7454555397/208829293/230977082/1408174/goto:http:/ww
w.progressivereform.org/CPRblog> 

455 Massachusetts Ave. NW, #150-513 | Washington, DC 20001 US




This email was sent to [email protected]. To ensure that you continue
receiving our emails, please add us to your
address book or safe list.

manage
<http://e2ma.net/app/view:Manage/signupId:1417120/id:1408174.7454555397/
rid:0263db7495b386089bc71ac8d0b5b2aa>  your preferences | opt out
<http://e2ma.net/app/view:OptOut/ID:1408174.7454555397/signupId:1417120/
rid:0263db7495b386089bc71ac8d0b5b2aa>  using TrueRemove(tm)

Got this as a forward? Sign up
<http://e2ma.net/app/view:Join/signupId:1417120/acctId:1408174/mailingId
:208829293/rid:0263db7495b386089bc71ac8d0b5b2aa>  to receive our future
emails.

 Network for
Good<http://e2ma.net/userdata/20050/images/templates/nfg_emma_logo.gif> 
EmailNow powered by Emma
<http://e2ma.net/go/7454555397/208829293/230977083/1408174/goto:http:/ww
w1.networkforgood.org/for-nonprofits/fundraising/emailnow> 

 

Reply via email to