Hi Jody,

I just ran the tag updater on gt-api but when I checked the resulting
javadocs the module listing was missing for some classes. It turned
out the header javadocs for those classes had an existing @source tag
that had been incorrectly split across lines, so I'll add a check for
that to the updater.

Michael


On 24 May 2011 00:53, Jody Garnett <[email protected]> wrote:
> The developers guide is open to a change procedure; if we want to make that
> a minimum standard. Indeed since the developers guide needs a bit of love;
> perhaps we could ask for a stay of execution; and just do quick votes on the
> email list here?
> Personally my bare minimum is a single sentence class javadoc. And yes I
> agree for anything that is considered api (such as gt-opengis or gt-api
> module that we should expect a lot more :-D ).
> Looks like you are done your hacking on the @source tag fixer; did the work
> go well? Do you want to run it on gt-opengis and gt-api for me tomorrow?
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On Tuesday, 24 May 2011 at 12:30 AM, Michael Bedward wrote:
>
> Thanks Jody. Although there are no javadoc minimum standards I wonder
> if it would be ok to add some encouragement for people to have
> javadocs for at least the most important public methods in a class. It
> makes such a difference :)
>
> I've updated the page for the new InsertSourceTag usage.
>
> Michael
>
> On 23 May 2011 19:55, Jody Garnett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Based on the conversation from about the @source tag; I have added some
> javadocs recommendations to the developers guide.
> http://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/guide/conventions/code/style.html
> (And stolen a live code example from SimpleFeatureType which seems to
> illustrate all the points).
>
> Can I ask for a review of the following; any pet javadocs peeves feel free
> to add to that page.
>
> Javadocs
>
> The project does not have any minimum standards for javadocs; so it is not
> something that will cause you to fail a code review.
>
> Here is an example javadoc to use as a reference for the following
> conversation:
>
> /**
> * An instance of {@link SimpleFeatureType} composed of fixed list values in
> a known order.
> * <p>
> * The definition of a "simple feature" can be summed up as the following:
> * <ul>
> * <li>made up of only non-complex attributes, no associations
> * <li>attributes are of multiplicity 1
> * <li>attributes are ordered
> * <li>attribute names are unqualified (namespaceURI == null)
> * </ul>
> * </p>
> * <p>
> * <h3>Attribute Access</h3>
> * The order and multiplicity restrictions on simple feature make attribute
> * values accessible via an index. For example consider the following
> shapefile
> * entry:
> * <pre>
> * || GEOMETRY | INT | STRING |
> * | POINT(0 0) | 0 | "zero" |
> * </pre>
> * Accessing attributes via index would look like:
> * <pre>
> * SimpleFeature feature = ...;
> *
> * Geometry g = (Geometry) feature.getAttribute( 0 );
> * Integer i = (Integer) feature.getAttribute( 1 );
> * String s = (String) feature.getAttribute( 2 );
> * </pre>
> * One could also access by name:
> * <pre>
> * SimpleFeature feature = ...;
> *
> * Geometry g = (Geometry) feature.getAttribute( "GEOMETRY" );
> * Integer i = (Integer) feature.getAttribute( "INT" );
> * String s = (String) feature.getAttribute( "STRING" );
> * </pre>
> * </p>
> * <p>
> * <b>Note:</b> Attribute access via getAttribute() methods returns
> attribute
> * values, and not the attributes themselves. For access to the actual
> attributes
> * {@link ComplexAttribute#getProperty(String)} can be used.
> * </p>
> *
> * @see SimpleFeatureType
> *
> * @author Jody Garnett (LISAsoft)
> * @author Justin Deoliveira (The Open Planning Project)
> * @since 2.5
> * @version 8.0
> * @source
> $URL:http://svn.osgeo.org/geotools/trunk/modules/library/opengis/src/main/java/org/opengis/feature/simple/SimpleFeature.java
> $
> */
>
> We do encourage developers to:
>
> Have “topic sentence” for each class (to help IDE developers understand what
> the class is). (This is a reminder of normal javadoc convention).
>
> Use <pre> for any code examples (This is a reminder of normal javadoc
> convention).
>
> Use @author tags to credit individuals involved, you can credit their
> organisation in brackets
>
> Use @since to list the version number in which the interface first appeared
>
> Update @version annotation if the interface is ever modified
>
> We have a custom @source annotation to help our javadocs look pretty (and
> reference the appropraite module).
>
> The taglet code discards $URL: $ if you would like to use svn to expand the
> correct path as needed.
>
> There is a tool you can use to fill in the @src annotation.
>
> To insert missing source tag in all source files for module gt-wps.:
>
> cd trunk/build/maven/javadoc
> mvn exec:java -Dexec.mainClass=org.geotools.maven.tools.InsertSourceTag
> -DcommandlineArgs=../../modules/unsupported/wps/src
>
> If you are using svn expansion you can set the svn:keyword expansion up:
>
> find ../modules/unsupported/wps/src -type f -name '*.java' -exec svn ps
> svn:keywords "Id URL" {} \;
>
> If you would like to include any diagrams or pictures please add them to
> a doc-files folder. (This is a reminder of normal javadoc convention).
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
> Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its
> next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran
> developers boost performance applications - including clusters.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
> _______________________________________________
> Geotools-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, 
you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
Download your free trial now. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to