On 22/07/2010, at 10:20 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: >>> Cool. Any preference for a package? >> I think we are starting to have a stable process api; I would not >> merging that into gt-api; so we can make use of the annotations >> throughout the library. > > I was looking for a package, not a module...
org.geotools.process - I think we have proven the approach and we should stick them right next to the interface. > The work I did already finds out that you have a ProgressListener among > the arguments of the static method and if so, it passes down the one > provided with the process call. We can do the same with the above. Tricky! Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
