2009/8/19 Jody Garnett wrote:
> We should move documentation discussion to the developer (or user?) list :-)
>

Done - and thanks for the handy rst tips

Michael


> I have had some luck using the comments and the "start-after" /
> "end-before" literalinlcudes syntax to allow us to reformat the
> example files and not mess up the docs.
>
> Example from csv2shp.rst
>
>   .. literalinclude::
> ../../../../../demo/example/src/main/java/org/geotools/demo/Csv2Shape.java
>      :language: java
>      :start-after: // start getNewShapeFile
>      :end-before: // end getNewShapeFile
>
> Please keep that in mind as you are working :-)
>
> With respect to the pom.xml examples; I am tempted to hard code the
> version numbers into demo/example/pom.xml and then use "lines"
> literalincludes syntax in our documentation - somethign like:
>
>   .. literalinclude:: ../../../../../demo/example/pom.xml
>      :language: java
>      :lines: 47,50-62,65
>
> This would change our release process; in that we would have more
> version numbers to update when making a release.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to